PRIVATIZATION!
All solar energy needs is for someone to own it. Same with the Post Office, but that's a story for another day. Fifteen dollars to mail a letter isn't outrageous when you consider that the founders waited weeks for mail that now could be delivered overnight, for $15. The key to everything in America is privatization- someone must profit from every aspect of life, from womb to tomb, or we become communists. No one wants that.
Now, I'm not talking one man like in a Bond film where some albino creates a deathray and threatens to destroy the sun and yada yada. No such melodramatic nonsense. It's not necessary. I'm talking a corporation. It doesn't have to be Exxon. Just someone who knows about energy and how to promote it.
Just get some Congressmen together and, after some money is exchanged, award the rights to the sun to Exxon (or whoever) and then lease it to them, perhaps for one dollar a year. But, only for one hundred years, with an option for one hundred more.
Of course, no one can physically possess the sun. Can't be done. But, they can possess the rights and, in a court of law, that's even better.
The earth, as some may know, revolves around the sun. This means that when it's daytime here it's nighttime on the other side of the world like in France or Australia or whatever. People are used to that. It rises in the east and sets in the west too. You can almost set your watch by it, That's gotta change.
The media will have to help out. With their help, the viewing public can forget this business of the earth rotating, revolving and all that. Just put it on their teleprompters that there are certain factors that cause solar shortages and only higher prices can remedy that. They could make a killing on summer! Winter would take a bit of work though. There's less sunlight in winter...but that's because there is a shortage of solar and the price is going to have to go up to reflect that. The Marketing Department would call that period, "Daylight Savings Time". We could all pull together as a country and conserve solar energy and if we have to pay a little but more, so be it. The payoff is in the period formerly known as "summer" where we bask in the patriotic glow of sunshine...during the summer sunning season, where- with demand being high- prices reflect that volume of need....
Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking. "Ferrerman! What about cloudy days?"
Cloudy days are the invisible hand of the free market but, with a twist. Government subsidies cover the Solar Companies for their cloudy day losses. And, as always, anyone caught illegally harnessing solar power will be subject to fines and incarceration. As for the poor and homeless who live off the solar paid for by others(!) isn't it just about time we killed those moochers?
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Monday, January 13, 2014
The Golden Touched
There's just something about the Discovery Channel reality show, Bering Sea Gold, that restores my faith in reality television. Most reality TV is fake and scripted and rather obviously so. See: Amish Mafia or Moonshiners among dozen's of others that are heavily scripted and rely on tremendously untalented, non-actors to, well- act- and it shows. Reality TV is the drunken step-brother of the documentary. You could learn all you need to know about moonshine in a single 90 minute documentary but you can fill a Tuesday night time slot about moonshine for years to come if you treat the show like it's Beverly Hillbillies making moonshine. A documentary tells a story through editing, via the soul of the filmmaker while reality just shows up.
Bering Sea Gold is about some of the goofiest knuckleheads you've ever seen, but it puts them on barges and slapped together boats, offshore of Nome, Alaska diving for gold in the summer. It even shows the same folks diving under the ice in winter, as well. Ya gotta be nuts and they are. Some of these people are- at times- pretty much homeless. If there are big time gold-dredging operations they must not be interesting because none of those are featured. Though the Pomrenke family has hundreds of thousands invested in their barge, dredging operation, it's from years of expanding rather than somebody starting out with a small fortune in search of a larger one. There's some unseen benefactors behind the scenes backing some of these people. But for the most part I think these people are backed in the usual manner of, money from friends and family and desperate credit card choices.
Essentially, to mine for gold you need a barge of sorts seaworthy enough to go a few hundred yards off shore and a diver experienced enough to dive what looks to be about 25 feet down and operate a big shopvac that sucks up material from the Bering Sea floor. Like mining on shore, the material runs through a sluice catching (hopefully) little bits of gold that add up to big money.
This is tough stuff. The Bering Sea is never pleasant. The dive suits are heated. It's Alaska. Nobody who does this is too normal. They just couldn't be.
The drama seems real. These people seem to work hard and not play well with others. I seriously question if Steve Reidel and Scott Meisterheim aren't mentally ill because they seem stubbornly determined to NOT make any money at this. Steve is just a free-spirited goofball and Scott is an asshole. I think that between the two of them they've made about $12 diving for gold. They remind me of guys I've worked with who were always looking to go home for any reason. None of the men are what you might call normal as anger issues abound. That far up north it might as well be the bi-polar ice caps.
There is one woman regular, Emily Reidel, daughter of Steve. You watch him and you have to grade her on a curve allowing for having him as a father. All things considered, she's pretty normal. Attractive too. They don't doll any of the fellas up for the shoots so with Emily, what you see is Emily au natural. She cleans up pretty well too. Everybody in life and reality TV has to have a back story and hers was that she got into gold dredging hoping to finance a trip to Italy to study opera. Well, why not? But, three seasons later she's still in Alaska, now as captain of her own dredge. She has history with Zeke, another captain that may have been of the friends with benefits persuasion. He was in love with her in season one but it seemed unrequited. That story is there but I don't feel as if they've exploited it unnecessarily and I like that. It's a gold show. It's not the Cheers bar.
One man- Vern Adkison- is searching for gold because he is a staunch, anti-government conservative of the Ron Paul variety, I might guess, because he wants the gold for its enduring value as currency. He doesn't trust the Fed. I wonder if he doesn't spend his spare time on the internet... This old guy has spent every nickel he has and gone into debt to find gold. When the economy collapses and he's sitting on a million dollars in gold, he'll be able to afford that loaf of bread that going for $100k.
Programs like these are heavily edited. The genius is in the production. That is why 'The Deadliest Catch' still holds people's attention after so many years of the same guys catching crab. They let stuff happen and they film it. If they miss something, like Zeke Tenhoff getting arrested and fighting with the cops, they deal with the aftermath of that rather than fucking around trying to recreate it as others might do. I highly respect that. Zeke's description to his mates of his arrest and incarceration was far better than if the cameras had been there. The guy is a maniac. Last season his childhood friend committed suicide with a pistol. It was the second of his childhood friends to die in that manner. This can't bode well for Zeke.
I kinda root for these people. I can't help it. If you and a couple of rag-tag lunkheads can dive into the frigid waters of the Bering Sea and find gold, find as much as you can. Though there is a lot of luck involved, there is nothing easy about it. If I were more comfortable in the water and less comfortable in my sanity, I might do it myself.
Bering Sea Gold is about some of the goofiest knuckleheads you've ever seen, but it puts them on barges and slapped together boats, offshore of Nome, Alaska diving for gold in the summer. It even shows the same folks diving under the ice in winter, as well. Ya gotta be nuts and they are. Some of these people are- at times- pretty much homeless. If there are big time gold-dredging operations they must not be interesting because none of those are featured. Though the Pomrenke family has hundreds of thousands invested in their barge, dredging operation, it's from years of expanding rather than somebody starting out with a small fortune in search of a larger one. There's some unseen benefactors behind the scenes backing some of these people. But for the most part I think these people are backed in the usual manner of, money from friends and family and desperate credit card choices.
Essentially, to mine for gold you need a barge of sorts seaworthy enough to go a few hundred yards off shore and a diver experienced enough to dive what looks to be about 25 feet down and operate a big shopvac that sucks up material from the Bering Sea floor. Like mining on shore, the material runs through a sluice catching (hopefully) little bits of gold that add up to big money.
This is tough stuff. The Bering Sea is never pleasant. The dive suits are heated. It's Alaska. Nobody who does this is too normal. They just couldn't be.
The drama seems real. These people seem to work hard and not play well with others. I seriously question if Steve Reidel and Scott Meisterheim aren't mentally ill because they seem stubbornly determined to NOT make any money at this. Steve is just a free-spirited goofball and Scott is an asshole. I think that between the two of them they've made about $12 diving for gold. They remind me of guys I've worked with who were always looking to go home for any reason. None of the men are what you might call normal as anger issues abound. That far up north it might as well be the bi-polar ice caps.
There is one woman regular, Emily Reidel, daughter of Steve. You watch him and you have to grade her on a curve allowing for having him as a father. All things considered, she's pretty normal. Attractive too. They don't doll any of the fellas up for the shoots so with Emily, what you see is Emily au natural. She cleans up pretty well too. Everybody in life and reality TV has to have a back story and hers was that she got into gold dredging hoping to finance a trip to Italy to study opera. Well, why not? But, three seasons later she's still in Alaska, now as captain of her own dredge. She has history with Zeke, another captain that may have been of the friends with benefits persuasion. He was in love with her in season one but it seemed unrequited. That story is there but I don't feel as if they've exploited it unnecessarily and I like that. It's a gold show. It's not the Cheers bar.
One man- Vern Adkison- is searching for gold because he is a staunch, anti-government conservative of the Ron Paul variety, I might guess, because he wants the gold for its enduring value as currency. He doesn't trust the Fed. I wonder if he doesn't spend his spare time on the internet... This old guy has spent every nickel he has and gone into debt to find gold. When the economy collapses and he's sitting on a million dollars in gold, he'll be able to afford that loaf of bread that going for $100k.
Programs like these are heavily edited. The genius is in the production. That is why 'The Deadliest Catch' still holds people's attention after so many years of the same guys catching crab. They let stuff happen and they film it. If they miss something, like Zeke Tenhoff getting arrested and fighting with the cops, they deal with the aftermath of that rather than fucking around trying to recreate it as others might do. I highly respect that. Zeke's description to his mates of his arrest and incarceration was far better than if the cameras had been there. The guy is a maniac. Last season his childhood friend committed suicide with a pistol. It was the second of his childhood friends to die in that manner. This can't bode well for Zeke.
I kinda root for these people. I can't help it. If you and a couple of rag-tag lunkheads can dive into the frigid waters of the Bering Sea and find gold, find as much as you can. Though there is a lot of luck involved, there is nothing easy about it. If I were more comfortable in the water and less comfortable in my sanity, I might do it myself.
Sunday, January 12, 2014
A Programming Note For The Thinking Impaired
It's Sunday and for many folks that means time for the Sunday Morning News Shows. Not Ferrerman! I'm watching 'Die Hard' with Bruce Willis and his original hair. I've seen it a hundred times and I know how it ends. Same with The Sunday Morning Shows.
Matter a fact, remember when the republicans were first trying to make BENGHAZI!!!!!! into 'IRAN-CONTRA: THE REVENGE' ? I remember John McCain (NOT John McClane) noting that Hillary Clinton and/or Susan Rice "....had all made the rounds of The Sunday Morning Shows...' down-playing the notion that BENGHAZI!!!!!!! was as bad as 9/11 like republicans were beginning to say. As I recall, McCain made the rounds of The Sunday Morning Shows to declare this. It's pretty clear that he and his kind in D.C. put a lot of stock in what is said on The Sunday Morning Shows. I don't. They are as scripted and phoney as Bruce Willis crawling through air ducts. In real life that are not made to support the weight of a full-grown actor. They move air which is as light as...air...not people!
The Sunday Morning Shows are for politicians to lay out the upcoming week's political bullshit for their rivals and for the political junkies that need that info but don't know it's just dog whistle stuff. The Sunday Morning Shows is where a republican politician will go on one program and demand: "Where are the jobs, Obama??!! Tens of millions are out of work- more than your BIG GOVERNMENT figures claim! People need help! Why aren't you helping long-term unemployed people who have given up hope???!!"
That's some pretty powerful bullshit there. I say bullshit not because I'm a democratic Ferrerman but, because I'm a democratic Ferrerman who knows that on the next stop on The Sunday Morning Shows, the exact same motherfucker will solve long-term unemployment by denying long-term unemployment benefits "....to people who clearly don't want to work and would rather suck off the government teat!"
The same guy! On one show there are no jobs and it's the president's fault and twenty minutes later there are tons of jobs but millions of people too lazy to get them because they prefer getting paid to do nothing! Are they Congressmen? How dare they...
So which is it? When the distinguished gentleman from The Great State Of Duplicity speaks out of both sides of his mouth, which side do we believe?
He's actually saying the same thing, just two different ways. His actual message is: President = BAD! And unemployment BENEFITS = BAD!!
This is what politicians have always done. You'd think that the immediacy and permanent record of television, combined with the internet, would expose the shit out of these lying bastards but, you'd be wrong. It doesn't matter. Jon Stewart exposes their hypocrisy and lies four nights a week and they still keep him busy with their bullshit because people hear only what they want to hear. Politicians know this and tailor their message to their constituents, the ones that don't wine, dine and align them. The people help out by willingly listening to a congressperson lie to them. They are convenient lies.
Politics is about right and wrong. It's almost Biblical. Ask yourself , "What would Jesus do?" Would Jesus bomb this or that country? Would Jesus not feed the poor or heal the sick? Would Jesus say, "Fuck you, you non-job having moocher!"?
Of course not. You don't have to be a Christian to have Christian values. In fact, most Christians do not have Christian values. If they did, they would be the ones desiring healthcare for all plus food and clothing for the poor. Instead, it's Godless democrats who do that. Fucking ironic, huh? Odd too that The Sunday Morning Shows are on when people- Christian people- are supposed to be in church, not listening to politicians lying. Hmmm...shouldn't the politician be in church too? Well, at least we know where Ferrerman is and what he's not watching on TV.
Matter a fact, remember when the republicans were first trying to make BENGHAZI!!!!!! into 'IRAN-CONTRA: THE REVENGE' ? I remember John McCain (NOT John McClane) noting that Hillary Clinton and/or Susan Rice "....had all made the rounds of The Sunday Morning Shows...' down-playing the notion that BENGHAZI!!!!!!! was as bad as 9/11 like republicans were beginning to say. As I recall, McCain made the rounds of The Sunday Morning Shows to declare this. It's pretty clear that he and his kind in D.C. put a lot of stock in what is said on The Sunday Morning Shows. I don't. They are as scripted and phoney as Bruce Willis crawling through air ducts. In real life that are not made to support the weight of a full-grown actor. They move air which is as light as...air...not people!
The Sunday Morning Shows are for politicians to lay out the upcoming week's political bullshit for their rivals and for the political junkies that need that info but don't know it's just dog whistle stuff. The Sunday Morning Shows is where a republican politician will go on one program and demand: "Where are the jobs, Obama??!! Tens of millions are out of work- more than your BIG GOVERNMENT figures claim! People need help! Why aren't you helping long-term unemployed people who have given up hope???!!"
That's some pretty powerful bullshit there. I say bullshit not because I'm a democratic Ferrerman but, because I'm a democratic Ferrerman who knows that on the next stop on The Sunday Morning Shows, the exact same motherfucker will solve long-term unemployment by denying long-term unemployment benefits "....to people who clearly don't want to work and would rather suck off the government teat!"
The same guy! On one show there are no jobs and it's the president's fault and twenty minutes later there are tons of jobs but millions of people too lazy to get them because they prefer getting paid to do nothing! Are they Congressmen? How dare they...
So which is it? When the distinguished gentleman from The Great State Of Duplicity speaks out of both sides of his mouth, which side do we believe?
He's actually saying the same thing, just two different ways. His actual message is: President = BAD! And unemployment BENEFITS = BAD!!
This is what politicians have always done. You'd think that the immediacy and permanent record of television, combined with the internet, would expose the shit out of these lying bastards but, you'd be wrong. It doesn't matter. Jon Stewart exposes their hypocrisy and lies four nights a week and they still keep him busy with their bullshit because people hear only what they want to hear. Politicians know this and tailor their message to their constituents, the ones that don't wine, dine and align them. The people help out by willingly listening to a congressperson lie to them. They are convenient lies.
Politics is about right and wrong. It's almost Biblical. Ask yourself , "What would Jesus do?" Would Jesus bomb this or that country? Would Jesus not feed the poor or heal the sick? Would Jesus say, "Fuck you, you non-job having moocher!"?
Of course not. You don't have to be a Christian to have Christian values. In fact, most Christians do not have Christian values. If they did, they would be the ones desiring healthcare for all plus food and clothing for the poor. Instead, it's Godless democrats who do that. Fucking ironic, huh? Odd too that The Sunday Morning Shows are on when people- Christian people- are supposed to be in church, not listening to politicians lying. Hmmm...shouldn't the politician be in church too? Well, at least we know where Ferrerman is and what he's not watching on TV.
Friday, January 10, 2014
Barbarians At The Gates
There was a scene in last season's episodes of The Walking Dead where the town needed all hands on deck in an impending battle with the enemy of the non-dead variety. The Governor called for all hands and a Woodbury citizen protested that some of those hands were just teenage children.
"Teenagers" replied The Governor, "are a 20th century concept."
He then reiterated his command. ALL hands on deck. It was the 21st century, after all.
Teenagers are rather recent development in society. They are also becoming a vanishing breed. For all intents and purposes, teenagers began with the post-war, baby boom generation. The fifties brought about the first generation of teens that were expected to be consumers and enjoy life before going off to college or work in the trades, marry and raise their own children to be consumers. They rocked and rolled and watched TV. It was a great time to be a kid and it was only going to get better.
There were always privileged children who lived the easy life and had the latest this and that, but the end of WWII brought about a mass of children whose parents wanted the best for them. The American Dream was born. It's the American dream as we've known it, collectively. Your version may vary but it likely includes your kids having Xbox and maybe working a few hours at the mall to purchase their own games .or weed.
In the old days, lots of kids went to school perhaps just long enough to learn how to write their names and do some ciphering before they went off to work the farm or support the family in the local factory or coal mine. Most kids worked. It was generally hard, filthy labor that paid little. Children died, and lost limbs. It was just the way it was. The American dream for most then was to eat. For the entrepreneurs, the dream was the rewards of hard work- other people's hard work. That dream still lives on.
I think it's that dream that has been eroding that middle class dream of shopping malls and Rock N' Roll High Schools.
You and I would think that shopping malls filled with teenagers buying stuff would be awesome for anyone's version of the American dream but, that's why we're stupid losers who don't have corporations. I've said it before on these pages: As cool as we think we are, we can be replaced.We can be the third-world labor force. I'm sorry- what did you think breaking Unions and not-raising the minimum wage would do?
It's all well and good to screw the guy who puts your Big Mac together out of fair wages but, why should you be immune? I know you think you're valuable at your job but the reality is that a kid fresh out of college can do it for 1/4 the cost of paying you. Not as well- not at first-but your company doesn't care about that. They were paying you $80k This kid will do your job for $20k. Do the math. Remember when you said these people should take any job- regardless of pay? Your job is any job. Why didn't you see that coming?
Well, they forgot to tell you that part. Rather conveniently for them, wouldn't you say?
Aside from the Union-busting and the haggling over the minimum and the quest to eliminate it instead, they also have a major boner for the handouts that you despise- welfare and unemployment compensation. You may have noticed that Social Security has been referred to as an "entitlement" as has "medicare" even though you, me and most all of us pay into that. They have just about succeeded in convincing idiots that SS is 'welfare'. The alternative is the lottery of 401k's I guess. What could go wrong there, he asked, pointing to Wall Street ...
I think two years ago Missouri dropped their Child Labor laws, rather quietly. Nike sweatshops didn't spring up overnight in St. Louis but, why did they do that? When Mitt Romney was caught on tape with his 47% comment, he had already openly admitted that it was tough to compete with China when they had to use barbed wire fences and guards to keep out people who would force their way in to work for 98 cents per hour. And how 'bout that trampoline spread out in the Atrium of the dormitory for Happy Fun Hour? How do we (them) compete with that?
Well, for starters, eliminate the minimum wage, welfare and other safety trampolines- nets- that people could count on because those things, along with Unions and retirement money, make people soft and complacent and not the thrifty working class necessary for a strong country. Weird but, we were strong when we had all those things. Then they made us weak? How did that happen? That was the old days. I guess they just didn't work out and we have to go back to the old, old days. That must be it.
"Teenagers" replied The Governor, "are a 20th century concept."
He then reiterated his command. ALL hands on deck. It was the 21st century, after all.
Teenagers are rather recent development in society. They are also becoming a vanishing breed. For all intents and purposes, teenagers began with the post-war, baby boom generation. The fifties brought about the first generation of teens that were expected to be consumers and enjoy life before going off to college or work in the trades, marry and raise their own children to be consumers. They rocked and rolled and watched TV. It was a great time to be a kid and it was only going to get better.
There were always privileged children who lived the easy life and had the latest this and that, but the end of WWII brought about a mass of children whose parents wanted the best for them. The American Dream was born. It's the American dream as we've known it, collectively. Your version may vary but it likely includes your kids having Xbox and maybe working a few hours at the mall to purchase their own games .or weed.
In the old days, lots of kids went to school perhaps just long enough to learn how to write their names and do some ciphering before they went off to work the farm or support the family in the local factory or coal mine. Most kids worked. It was generally hard, filthy labor that paid little. Children died, and lost limbs. It was just the way it was. The American dream for most then was to eat. For the entrepreneurs, the dream was the rewards of hard work- other people's hard work. That dream still lives on.
I think it's that dream that has been eroding that middle class dream of shopping malls and Rock N' Roll High Schools.
You and I would think that shopping malls filled with teenagers buying stuff would be awesome for anyone's version of the American dream but, that's why we're stupid losers who don't have corporations. I've said it before on these pages: As cool as we think we are, we can be replaced.We can be the third-world labor force. I'm sorry- what did you think breaking Unions and not-raising the minimum wage would do?
It's all well and good to screw the guy who puts your Big Mac together out of fair wages but, why should you be immune? I know you think you're valuable at your job but the reality is that a kid fresh out of college can do it for 1/4 the cost of paying you. Not as well- not at first-but your company doesn't care about that. They were paying you $80k This kid will do your job for $20k. Do the math. Remember when you said these people should take any job- regardless of pay? Your job is any job. Why didn't you see that coming?
Well, they forgot to tell you that part. Rather conveniently for them, wouldn't you say?
Aside from the Union-busting and the haggling over the minimum and the quest to eliminate it instead, they also have a major boner for the handouts that you despise- welfare and unemployment compensation. You may have noticed that Social Security has been referred to as an "entitlement" as has "medicare" even though you, me and most all of us pay into that. They have just about succeeded in convincing idiots that SS is 'welfare'. The alternative is the lottery of 401k's I guess. What could go wrong there, he asked, pointing to Wall Street ...
I think two years ago Missouri dropped their Child Labor laws, rather quietly. Nike sweatshops didn't spring up overnight in St. Louis but, why did they do that? When Mitt Romney was caught on tape with his 47% comment, he had already openly admitted that it was tough to compete with China when they had to use barbed wire fences and guards to keep out people who would force their way in to work for 98 cents per hour. And how 'bout that trampoline spread out in the Atrium of the dormitory for Happy Fun Hour? How do we (them) compete with that?
Well, for starters, eliminate the minimum wage, welfare and other safety trampolines- nets- that people could count on because those things, along with Unions and retirement money, make people soft and complacent and not the thrifty working class necessary for a strong country. Weird but, we were strong when we had all those things. Then they made us weak? How did that happen? That was the old days. I guess they just didn't work out and we have to go back to the old, old days. That must be it.
Patriot Pay Day!
Maybe we've been going at this minimum wage thing all wrong? What if we lowered everyone's pay instead?
I don't know everyone and it might seem kind of presumptuous and assholey of me to think everyone makes too much money, but that's a pretty big club. You, me- we all fit right in.
Seriously, anyone who thinks $7.25 an hour is "plenty" or even "too much" to live on, ought to try it. Put your pocketbook where your mouth is. Help a country out.
If you can sit there, presumably fat and sassy, at your computer and say that $10 an hour or the $15 many economists say would be closer to being in-line with current cost of living is too much or that it would hurt the economy, they I can feel free to believe you make too much money. You're hurting the economy. Cut it out!
Cut your pay. Don't be chintzy either. Take it down to the $7.25 an hour you think is just fine and even a living wage for others. You'll be alright just like they would be alright. You know this because you said so yourself. You weren't lying about that, were you?
What might be the benefits of such a mass, across-the-board pay savings to America? Well, prices would go down, I guess. I mean, if they would surely rise with an increase to the minimum, they'd surely plummet if everybody took a massive pay cut. That's Economics 101. I'm not the internet economist that other people are but, low labor costs are the key to low, low prices. volume. Volume. VOLUME!
And, for those of you who still believe in trickle down after 30 plus years of that fantasy, profits would fucking jump! That can't ever be a bad thing, can it?
Isn't it time the country pulled together like this? If half the country knows people can live cheerfully on the minimum, lets make it the maximum for all of us. No, not the job creators. They can't live on the minimum. They are not as strong as we are. They can't survive without tax breaks. We can. It hurts them- physically- to pay taxes. Subsequently, many don't despite having billions of dollars they could be using to pay for roads, schools and the etc's of life in America that make us awesome, despite those etc's being socialist as all get out.
But you know, if I say that Mr Exxon or Mr Walmart "make too much money", I raise the ire of dipshits all over the internet who will call me a communist. Somehow, they have been told that taxing rich folks is "redistribution of wealth". Worse, the stupid fuckers believe this. They say: "How can you say $100 Billion is 'too much'?" That's just idiotic. The same folks say $15 an hour is "too much". Idiots.
Idiocy though, can be forgiven. Assholicy, can not.
Talk to your boss. Take that cut. Live on the Federal minimum wage . Treat yourself. We'll throw in welfare- if you qualify and if it's still there. And by all means, keep your insurance. You owe it to yourself and, you can afford it!. Really, you owe it to America. Don't we all owe it to our job creators? They think we do.
I don't know everyone and it might seem kind of presumptuous and assholey of me to think everyone makes too much money, but that's a pretty big club. You, me- we all fit right in.
Seriously, anyone who thinks $7.25 an hour is "plenty" or even "too much" to live on, ought to try it. Put your pocketbook where your mouth is. Help a country out.
If you can sit there, presumably fat and sassy, at your computer and say that $10 an hour or the $15 many economists say would be closer to being in-line with current cost of living is too much or that it would hurt the economy, they I can feel free to believe you make too much money. You're hurting the economy. Cut it out!
Cut your pay. Don't be chintzy either. Take it down to the $7.25 an hour you think is just fine and even a living wage for others. You'll be alright just like they would be alright. You know this because you said so yourself. You weren't lying about that, were you?
What might be the benefits of such a mass, across-the-board pay savings to America? Well, prices would go down, I guess. I mean, if they would surely rise with an increase to the minimum, they'd surely plummet if everybody took a massive pay cut. That's Economics 101. I'm not the internet economist that other people are but, low labor costs are the key to low, low prices. volume. Volume. VOLUME!
And, for those of you who still believe in trickle down after 30 plus years of that fantasy, profits would fucking jump! That can't ever be a bad thing, can it?
Isn't it time the country pulled together like this? If half the country knows people can live cheerfully on the minimum, lets make it the maximum for all of us. No, not the job creators. They can't live on the minimum. They are not as strong as we are. They can't survive without tax breaks. We can. It hurts them- physically- to pay taxes. Subsequently, many don't despite having billions of dollars they could be using to pay for roads, schools and the etc's of life in America that make us awesome, despite those etc's being socialist as all get out.
But you know, if I say that Mr Exxon or Mr Walmart "make too much money", I raise the ire of dipshits all over the internet who will call me a communist. Somehow, they have been told that taxing rich folks is "redistribution of wealth". Worse, the stupid fuckers believe this. They say: "How can you say $100 Billion is 'too much'?" That's just idiotic. The same folks say $15 an hour is "too much". Idiots.
Idiocy though, can be forgiven. Assholicy, can not.
Talk to your boss. Take that cut. Live on the Federal minimum wage . Treat yourself. We'll throw in welfare- if you qualify and if it's still there. And by all means, keep your insurance. You owe it to yourself and, you can afford it!. Really, you owe it to America. Don't we all owe it to our job creators? They think we do.
Friday, January 3, 2014
It's just business. They're taking it personal!
People on the internet often say: "If I ran my imaginary business like the government, I would be OUT of my imaginary business!" Well, I think they are out of their imaginary minds.
Government is a business. They have customers (that's us), employees (some of us), they make a product (war and stuff, I guess), and they have a CEO and a Board of Directors. That would be the President and Congress. They even have competition in the form of other countries. It is a business!
Now, along comes the GOP and their political wing, the teabaggers. At the very best, the GOP wants to take over government and downsize it- make it smaller. At it's worst, the teabaggers amongst them want to completely dismantle it. They think we'd all be better off foraging for berries in the forest.
Three hundred plus million people looking for berries in the woods is just fucking stupid so, forget about those stupid assholes.
These other assholes- the lamestream republicans- the ones that think Reagan was a great president, they euphemistically believe in "small government". Small government is a government that exists only to wage war and does so without taxing anyone but lazy poor people. This might be their motto:
"From each lazy person, to the job creators, according to what bizzaro Jesus would do."
Governments, like any business, are subject to failure. Your local pizza place has probably had an "UNDER NEW MANAGEMENT!" sign on it a few times in the last couple of decades. Every four to eight years here our government puts out the "under new management"sign even though it's not really "new". There's always holdovers on the Board of Directors and other employees and it's about as 'new' as Sal taking over his cousin Vinnies pizza place. It's kinda all for show. Most of us know that.
But, here's the thing. You can tweak a business and try and make it better by doing this and maybe not doing that but, in a country like this (we're pretty big) you can't make it a small operation after it's become big . Microsoft may have started in a garage but, they're not going back to their roots by going back to the garage. You know why? Because Bill Gates is not a fucking idiot. It's that simple. Yes, it would be cheaper to run Microsoft in a garage but it would be fucking stupid.
So, you can't run America from a garage. The founders never even did that, for you Constitutional scholars out there. The country was not founded in Washington's Ye Olde Coach House after all. Ye can google that.
Besides, who takes over an operation the size of the United States telling the customers that they are going to do LESS for them? A LOT LESS! I can't believe they get people to go along with that but, they do. It would be like Sal and Vinnies Pizza but, instead of them making a pizza (roads, for example) you bring in all the ingredients (concrete, asphalt etc.) and you make your own pizza (road)- just for you! And you pay Sal and Vinnie! NO YUCKY ENTITLEMENTS!!!
Man, if republican's intend to run the government like a literal small business, how soon before they torch the place for the insurance?
Government is a business. They have customers (that's us), employees (some of us), they make a product (war and stuff, I guess), and they have a CEO and a Board of Directors. That would be the President and Congress. They even have competition in the form of other countries. It is a business!
Now, along comes the GOP and their political wing, the teabaggers. At the very best, the GOP wants to take over government and downsize it- make it smaller. At it's worst, the teabaggers amongst them want to completely dismantle it. They think we'd all be better off foraging for berries in the forest.
Three hundred plus million people looking for berries in the woods is just fucking stupid so, forget about those stupid assholes.
These other assholes- the lamestream republicans- the ones that think Reagan was a great president, they euphemistically believe in "small government". Small government is a government that exists only to wage war and does so without taxing anyone but lazy poor people. This might be their motto:
"From each lazy person, to the job creators, according to what bizzaro Jesus would do."
Governments, like any business, are subject to failure. Your local pizza place has probably had an "UNDER NEW MANAGEMENT!" sign on it a few times in the last couple of decades. Every four to eight years here our government puts out the "under new management"sign even though it's not really "new". There's always holdovers on the Board of Directors and other employees and it's about as 'new' as Sal taking over his cousin Vinnies pizza place. It's kinda all for show. Most of us know that.
But, here's the thing. You can tweak a business and try and make it better by doing this and maybe not doing that but, in a country like this (we're pretty big) you can't make it a small operation after it's become big . Microsoft may have started in a garage but, they're not going back to their roots by going back to the garage. You know why? Because Bill Gates is not a fucking idiot. It's that simple. Yes, it would be cheaper to run Microsoft in a garage but it would be fucking stupid.
So, you can't run America from a garage. The founders never even did that, for you Constitutional scholars out there. The country was not founded in Washington's Ye Olde Coach House after all. Ye can google that.
Besides, who takes over an operation the size of the United States telling the customers that they are going to do LESS for them? A LOT LESS! I can't believe they get people to go along with that but, they do. It would be like Sal and Vinnies Pizza but, instead of them making a pizza (roads, for example) you bring in all the ingredients (concrete, asphalt etc.) and you make your own pizza (road)- just for you! And you pay Sal and Vinnie! NO YUCKY ENTITLEMENTS!!!
Man, if republican's intend to run the government like a literal small business, how soon before they torch the place for the insurance?
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
Aaron Rodgers To Fill In At Tight End
Turning to sports, Green Bay Packer quarterback, Aaron Rodgers denied rumors that he is gay. How fortunate for him that Packer fans suck.
OK, that was mean. Saying something nice....Aaron Rodgers sucks better than Jay Cutler!
This is not going to be easy...
Evidently Rodger's roommate and personal assistant...Kevin Lanfilsi... has put out some tweets that, well, sound like Lanfilsi was actually Rodgers' favorite receiver- not Jordy Nelson. And, he's a bit disgruntled.
In the radio interview, Rodgers apparently broached the subject himself, rather than fielding the question from a reporter. That's damage control. That's calling an audible at the line when you think the defense is on to you.
Kind of a dumb call on his part. Maybe he saw a blitz coming? The relationship is his business after all and, my guess is that if there is any romance between these two and it's over, he knows better than fans and media about what's happening or is about to happen.
As a Bear fan, I've made jokes in the past about Rodgers being gay. See above. It goes with the territory of fandom really. It's just joking around, what Father Francis Mulcahey would call: "Jocularity!" I can't say I ever thought about who Aaron Rodgers achieved orgasm with. It's not really important, ya know. Except for people who are obviously out and about, I tend to look at people at the face value of their sexuality. Honestly, I assume most people are straight and bitching about the men or women in their life regardless of team affiliation. I'd no more be concerned about Rodgers love-making partner than I would be about Jay Cutler and his girlfriend, Kristin. Really.
Part of being a Ferrerman is my free and open mind. Oh- and jokes! So, if I make fun of Rodgers for being kinda Johnny Jolly in his loafers and for his BJ Raji preference, I'm just playing! I know it's bad though like taunting a guy by saying he plays "like a girl..."
There's nothing wrong with being a girl or with being gay. Or being Black. Or being anyone who cares about others. We really need to stop diminishing people in society for who they are- for what we perceive that they are. Our perceptions are our problems. Our perceptions become their problems. That is the problem.
I probably should quit calling them the Green Gay Fudge Packers?
This isn't going to be easy....
OK, that was mean. Saying something nice....Aaron Rodgers sucks better than Jay Cutler!
This is not going to be easy...
Evidently Rodger's roommate and personal assistant...Kevin Lanfilsi... has put out some tweets that, well, sound like Lanfilsi was actually Rodgers' favorite receiver- not Jordy Nelson. And, he's a bit disgruntled.
In the radio interview, Rodgers apparently broached the subject himself, rather than fielding the question from a reporter. That's damage control. That's calling an audible at the line when you think the defense is on to you.
Kind of a dumb call on his part. Maybe he saw a blitz coming? The relationship is his business after all and, my guess is that if there is any romance between these two and it's over, he knows better than fans and media about what's happening or is about to happen.
As a Bear fan, I've made jokes in the past about Rodgers being gay. See above. It goes with the territory of fandom really. It's just joking around, what Father Francis Mulcahey would call: "Jocularity!" I can't say I ever thought about who Aaron Rodgers achieved orgasm with. It's not really important, ya know. Except for people who are obviously out and about, I tend to look at people at the face value of their sexuality. Honestly, I assume most people are straight and bitching about the men or women in their life regardless of team affiliation. I'd no more be concerned about Rodgers love-making partner than I would be about Jay Cutler and his girlfriend, Kristin. Really.
Part of being a Ferrerman is my free and open mind. Oh- and jokes! So, if I make fun of Rodgers for being kinda Johnny Jolly in his loafers and for his BJ Raji preference, I'm just playing! I know it's bad though like taunting a guy by saying he plays "like a girl..."
There's nothing wrong with being a girl or with being gay. Or being Black. Or being anyone who cares about others. We really need to stop diminishing people in society for who they are- for what we perceive that they are. Our perceptions are our problems. Our perceptions become their problems. That is the problem.
I probably should quit calling them the Green Gay Fudge Packers?
This isn't going to be easy....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)